[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 181 (Friday, September 18, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56423-56432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23315]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[4500030115]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on
25 Petitions
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of petition findings and initiation of status reviews.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90-
day findings on various petitions to list, reclassify, or delist fish,
wildlife, or plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). Based on our review, we find that two petitions do not
present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating
that the petitioned actions may be warranted, and we are not initiating
status reviews in response to these petitions. We refer to these as
``not-substantial petition findings.''
We also find that 23 petitions present substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be
warranted. Therefore, with the publication of this notice, we are
initiating a review of the status of these species to determine if the
petitioned actions are warranted. To ensure that these status reviews
are comprehensive, we are requesting scientific and commercial data and
other information regarding these species. Based on the status reviews,
we will issue 12-month findings on the petitions, which will address
whether the petitioned action is warranted, as provided in section
4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct the status reviews, we
request that we receive information no later than November 17, 2015.
Information submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the closing date.
ADDRESSES: Not-substantial petition findings: The not-substantial
petition findings announced in this document are available on http://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number (see Table 2,
below). Supporting information in preparing these findings is available
for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours by
contacting the appropriate person, as specified under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Status reviews: You may submit information on species for which a
status review is being initiated by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the appropriate docket
number (see Table 1, below). You may submit information by clicking on
``Comment Now!'' If your information will fit in the provided comment
box, please use this feature of http://www.regulations.gov, as it is
most compatible with our information review procedures. If you attach
your information as a separate document, our preferred file format is
Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple comments (such as form letters),
our preferred format is a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate docket number; see Table
1, below]; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg
Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
We request that you send information only by the methods described
above. We will post all information received on http://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, below, for more details).
Table 1--List of Substantial Findings for Which a Status Review Is Being Initiated
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common name Docket No. URL to docket in regs.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blue Calamintha bee.................. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0077....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-
2015-0077.
California spotted owl............... FWS-R8-ES-2015-0139....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0139.
Cascade torrent salamander........... FWS-R1-ES-2015-0080....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R1-ES-
2015-0080.
Columbia torrent salamander.......... FWS-R1-ES-2015-0083....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R1-ES-
2015-0083.
Florida pine snake................... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0086....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-
2015-0086.
Inyo Mountains salamander............ FWS-R8-ES-2015-0092....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0092.
Kern Plateau salamander.............. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0093....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0093.
Lesser slender salamander............ FWS-R8-ES-2015-0097....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0097.
Limestone salamander................. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0099....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0099.
Northern bog lemming................. FWS-R5-ES-2015-0103....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R5-ES-
2015-0103.
Panamint alligator lizard............ FWS-R8-ES-2015-0105....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0105.
[[Page 56424]]
Peaks of Otter salamander............ FWS-R5-ES-2015-0106....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R5-ES-
2015-0106.
Regal fritillary..................... FWS-R6-ES-2015-0078....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-
2015-0078.
Rusty patched bumble bee............. FWS-R3-ES-2015-0112....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R3-ES-
2015-0112.
Shasta salamander.................... FWS-R8-ES-2015-0115....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0115.
Short-tailed snake................... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0116....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-
2015-0116.
Southern rubber boa.................. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0119....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0119.
Tinian monarch....................... FWS-R1-ES-2015-0118....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R1-ES-
2015-0118.
Tricolored blackbird................. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0138....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0138.
Tufted puffin........................ FWS-R1-ES-2015-0108....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R1-ES-
2015-0108.
Virgin River spinedace............... FWS-R6-ES-2015-0121....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-
2015-0121.
Wood turtle.......................... FWS-R5-ES-2015-0122....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R5-ES-
2015-0122.
Yuman desert fringe-toed lizard...... FWS-R2-ES-2015-0124....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-
2015-0124.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--List of Not Substantial Findings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common name Docket No. URL to docket in regs.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cahaba pebblesnail................... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0079....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-
2015-0079.
Stephens' kangaroo rat............... FWS-R8-ES-2015-0140....................... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-
2015-0140.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common name Contact person
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blue Calamintha bee......................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679-7119.
Cahaba pebblesnail.......................... Robert Tawes, 404-679-7142.
California spotted owl...................... Scott Flaherty, 916-978-6156.
Cascade torrent salamander.................. Paul Henson, 503-231-6179.
Columbia torrent salamander................. Eric Rickerson, 360 753-9440.
Florida pine snake.......................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679-7119.
Inyo Mountains salamander................... Ted Koch, 775-861-6300.
Kern Plateau salamander..................... Jennifer Norris, 916-414-6600.
Lesser slender salamander................... Steven Henry, 805-644-1766.
Limestone salamander........................ Jennifer Norris, 916-414-6600.
Northern bog lemming........................ Krishna Gifford, 413-253-8619.
Panamint alligator lizard................... Mendel Stewart, 760-431-9440.
Peaks of Otter salamander................... Roberta Hylton, 276-623-1233, ext. 22.
Regal fritillary............................ Justin Shoemaker, 309-757-5800, ext. 214.
Rusty patched bumble bee.................... Laura Ragan, 612-713-5157.
Shasta salamander........................... Jennifer Norris, 916-414-6600.
Short-tailed snake.......................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679-7119.
Southern rubber boa......................... Mendel Stewart, 760-431-9440.
Stephens' kangaroo rat...................... Bradd Bridges, 760-431-9440, ext. 221.
Tinian monarch.............................. Kristi Young, 808-792-9400.
Tricolored blackbird........................ Jennifer Norris, 916-414-6600.
Tufted puffin............................... Eric Rickerson, 360 753-9440.
Virgin River spinedace...................... Justin Shoemaker, 309-757-5800, ext. 214.
Wood turtle................................. Wende Mahaney, 207-866-3344.
Yuman desert fringe-toed lizard............. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-248-6920.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Information for Status Reviews
When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing, reclassification, or delisting a
species may be warranted, we are required to promptly review the status
of the species (status review). For the status review to be complete
and based on the best available scientific and commercial information,
we request information on these species from governmental agencies,
Native American Tribes, the scientific community, industry, and any
other interested parties. We seek information on:
(1) The species' biology, range, and population trends, including:
(a) Habitat requirements;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy;
(c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns;
(d) Historical and current population levels, and current and
projected trends; and
(e) Past and ongoing conservation measures for the species, its
habitat, or both.
(2) The factors that are the basis for making a listing,
reclassification, or delisting determination for a species under
section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are:
[[Page 56425]]
(a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range (Factor A);
(b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes (Factor B);
(c) Disease or predation (Factor C);
(d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor D); or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence (Factor E).
(3) The potential effects of climate change on the species and its
habitat.
If, after the status review, we determine that listing is
warranted, we will propose critical habitat (see definition in section
3(5)(A) of the Act) for domestic (U.S.) species under section 4 of the
Act, to the maximum extent prudent and determinable at the time we
propose to list the species. Therefore, we also request data and
information for the species listed in Table 1 on:
(1) What may constitute ``physical or biological features essential
to the conservation of the species,'' within the geographical range
occupied by the species;
(2) Where these features are currently found;
(3) Whether any of these features may require special management
considerations or protection;
(4) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the
species that are ``essential for the conservation of the species''; and
(5) What, if any, critical habitat you think we should propose for
designation if the species is proposed for listing, and why such
habitat meets the requirements of section 4 of the Act.
Please include sufficient information with your submission (such as
scientific journal articles or other publications) to allow us to
verify any scientific or commercial information you include.
Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the actions
under consideration without providing supporting information, although
noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any
species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ``solely on
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.''
You may submit your information concerning these status reviews by
one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit
information via http://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission--
including any personal identifying information--will be posted on the
Web site. If you submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top of your document that we
withhold this personal identifying information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will
post all hardcopy submissions on http://www.regulations.gov.
Information and supporting documentation that we received and used
in preparing these 90-day findings is available for you to review at
http://www.regulations.gov, or you may make an appointment during
normal business hours at the appropriate lead U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Field Office (contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on
whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species presents
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. To the maximum extent practicable,
we are to make this finding within 90 days of our receipt of the
petition and publish our notice of the finding promptly in the Federal
Register.
Our standard for substantial scientific or commercial information
within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) with regard to a 90-day
petition finding is ``that amount of information that would lead a
reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in the petition
may be warranted'' (50 CFR 424.14(b)). If we find that substantial
scientific or commercial information was presented, we are required to
promptly commence a review of the status of the species, which will be
subsequently summarized in our 12-month finding.
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 424 set forth the procedures for adding a species
to, or removing a species from, the Federal Lists of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants. A species may be determined to be an
endangered or threatened species due to one or more of the five factors
described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see Request for Information
for Status Reviews, above).
In considering what factors might constitute threats, we must look
beyond the exposure of the species to a factor to evaluate whether the
species may respond to the factor in a way that causes actual impacts
to the species. If there is exposure to a factor and the species
responds negatively, the factor may be a threat and, during the
subsequent status review, we attempt to determine how significant a
threat it is. The threat is significant if it drives, or contributes
to, the risk of extinction of the species such that the species may
warrant listing as endangered or threatened as those terms are defined
in the Act. However, the identification of factors that could affect a
species negatively may not be sufficient to compel a finding that the
information in the petition and our files is substantial. The
information must include evidence sufficient to suggest that these
factors may be operative threats that act on the species to the point
that the species may meet the definition of an endangered or threatened
species under the Act.
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Blue Calamintha Bee as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2015-0077 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Blue Calamintha bee (Osmia calaminthae); Florida
Petition History
On February 5, 2015, we received a petition dated February 5, 2015,
from Defenders of Wildlife requesting that the blue Calamintha bee be
listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the blue Calamintha bee (Osmia calaminthae) based on
Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Cahaba Pebblesnail as an
Endangered Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as
[[Page 56426]]
an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-
2015-0079 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Cahaba pebblesnail (Clappia cahabensis); Alabama
Petition History
On January 6, 2015, we received a petition dated December 18, 2014,
from the Institute for Wildlife Protection, requesting that the Cahaba
pebblesnail be listed as endangered under the Act. The petition further
requested that we emergency list the species. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a
February 18, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we
reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find
that the petition presented information that an emergency listing is
warranted. This finding addresses the petition to list the species as
endangered.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition, sources cited in the petition,
and information available in our files at the time the petition was
received, we find that the petition does not provide substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Cahaba
pebblesnail (Clappia cahabensis) as endangered may be warranted.
Because the petition does not present substantial information
indicating that listing this species as endangered may be warranted, we
are not initiating a status review in response to this petition. Our
justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0079 under the
``Supporting Documents'' section. However, we ask that the public
submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the
status of, or threats to, the Cahaba pebblesnail or its habitat at any
time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the California Spotted Owl as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0139 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis); California
Petition History
On January 9, 2015, we received a petition dated December 22, 2014,
from the Wild Nature Institute and the John Muir Project of the Earth
Island Institute, requesting that the California spotted owl be listed
as endangered or threatened and that we designate critical habitat
under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and
included the requisite identification information for the petitioner,
required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a February 12, 2015, letter to the
petitioners, we responded that we reviewed the information presented in
the petition and did not find that the petition presented information
that an emergency listing is warranted. This finding addresses this
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petitions and sources cited in the
petitions, we find that the petitions present substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis
occidentalis) based on Factors A, D, and E. However, during our status
review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the
species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on
the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including
the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, above).
Second Petition To List the California Spotted Owl
We received another petition dated August 19, 2015, from Sierra
Forest Legacy and Defenders of Wildlife, to list the California spotted
owl as endangered, and requesting we designate critical habitat for the
species. This finding serves to notify the petitioners that we have
received their petition, and that, because we have made a substantial
finding on the December 22, 2014, petition and are initiating a status
review of the species, we will include the information they provided in
our status review for the owl.
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Cascade Torrent Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R1-ES-2015-0080 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Cascade torrent salamander (Rhyacotriton cascadae); Washington and
Oregon
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Cascade torrent salamander, be
listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Cascade torrent
salamander (Rhyacotriton cascadae) as endangered or threatened may be
warranted based on Factors A and E. However, during our status review,
we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus,
for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Columbia Torrent Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R1-ES-2015-0083 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Columbia torrent salamander (Rhyacotriton kezeri); Oregon and
Washington
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 amphibians and
reptiles, including the Columbia torrent salamander, be listed as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the
[[Page 56427]]
Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the
requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50
CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Columbia torrent
salamander (Rhyacotriton kezeri) as endangered or threatened may be
warranted based on Factor A. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factor
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Florida Pine Snake as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2015-0086 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Florida pine snake (Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus); Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, South Carolina
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Florida pine snake, be listed as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Florida pine snake (Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus)
for listing based on Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status
review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the
species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on
the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including
the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Inyo Mountains Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0092 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Inyo Mountains salamander (Batrachoseps campi); California.
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Inyo Mountains salamander, be
listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Inyo Mountains salamander (Batrachoseps campi) based
on Factor A. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly
evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species,
the Service requests information on the five listing factors under
section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factor identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Kern Plateau Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0093 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Kern Plateau salamander (Batrachoseps robustus); California
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Kern Plateau salamander, be
listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Kern Plateau salamander (Batrachoseps robustus) based
on Factor A. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly
evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species,
the Service requests information on the five listing factors under
section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factor identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Lesser Slender Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0097 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Lesser slender salamander (Batrachoseps minor); California
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the lesser slender salamander, be
listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we
[[Page 56428]]
find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for
the lesser slender salamander (Batrachoseps minor) based on Factors A
and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate
all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the
Service requests information on the five listing factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding
(see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Limestone Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0099 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Limestone salamander (Hydromantes brunus); California
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the limestone salamander, be listed
as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the limestone salamander (Hydromantes brunus) based on
Factor A. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly
evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species,
the Service requests information on the five listing factors under
section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factor identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Northern Bog Lemming as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R5-ES-2015-0103 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Northern bog lemming (Synaptomys borealis); Alaska, Washington, Idaho,
Maine, Montana, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and New York
Petition History
On September 30, 2014, we received a petition dated September 29,
2014, from WildEarth Guardians requesting that the northern bog lemming
be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for this species under the Act. The petitioner requested:
Listing of the full species;
Listing of the individual subspecies (in particular, the
disjunct population of S. b. sphagnicola south of the St. Lawrence
River in Maine and New Hampshire); or
Listing of the U.S. distinct population segment (DPS) of
S. b. chapmani.
The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the
requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50
CFR 424.14(a). In an October 3, 2014, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition
and did not find that the petition presented information that an
emergency listing is warranted. This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the northern bog lemming (Synaptomys borealis) based on
Factors A and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly
evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species,
the Service requests information on the five listing factors under
section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Panamint Alligator Lizard as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0105 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Panamint alligator lizard (Elgaria panamintina); California
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Panamint alligator lizard, be
listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Panamint alligator lizard (Elgaria panamintina) based
on Factors A and B. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Peaks of Otter Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R5-ES-2015-0106 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Peaks of Otter salamander (Plethodon hubrichti); Virginia
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity,
[[Page 56429]]
requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the
Peaks of Otter salamander, be listed as endangered or threatened and
that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act.
The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the
requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50
CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Peaks of Otter salamander (Plethodon hubrichti) based
on Factors A and E. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Regal Fritillary as an Endangered
or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2015-0078 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia); Kansas, Arkansas, North Carolina,
Missouri, Nebraska, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts,
Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey,
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia
Petition History
On April 24, 2013, we received a petition dated April 19, 2013,
from WildEarth Guardians, requesting that the regal fritillary be
listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) based on Factors A
and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate
all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the
Service requests information on the five listing factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding
(see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee as an
Endangered Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R3-ES-2015-0112 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis); Maine, New Hampshire,
Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York,
Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois,
Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and
Ontario, Canada
Petition History
On February 5, 2013, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service received a
petition dated January 31, 2013, from the Xerces Society for
Invertebrate Conservation (Xerces) requesting that the rusty patched
bumble bee be listed under the Act as an endangered species. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). On February 14, 2014, Xerces provided the Service with
written notice of their intent to sue for failure to issue a petition
finding. Xerces filed a complaint on May 13, 2014, against the Service
for failure to issue a timely 90-day finding. The Service and Xerces
reached a settlement to deliver a 90-day petition finding to the
Federal Register no later than September 30, 2015. This finding
addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) based on
Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Shasta Salamander as an Endangered
or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0115 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Shasta salamander (Hydromantes shastae); California
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Shasta salamander, be listed as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Shasta salamander
(Hydromantes shastae) as endangered or threatened may be warranted
based on Factors A and E. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Short-Tailed Snake as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2015-0116 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Short-tailed snake (Stilosoma extenuatum); Florida
[[Page 56430]]
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the short-tailed snake, be listed as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the short-tailed snake
(Stilosoma extenuatum) as endangered or threatened may be warranted
based on Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status review, we
will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus,
for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Southern Rubber Boa as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0119 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Southern rubber boa (Charina umbratica or Charina bottae umbratica);
California
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the southern rubber boa, be listed
as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the southern rubber boa
(Charina umbratica or Charina bottae umbratica) as endangered or
threatened may be warranted based on Factors A and E. However, during
our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to
the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information
on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including
the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat From the
Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0140 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi); California
Petition History
On November 10, 2014, we received a petition dated November 7,
2014, from the Riverside County Farm Bureau and the Center for
Environmental Science, Accuracy and Responsibility, requesting that
Stephens' kangaroo rat, which is listed as an endangered species, be
removed from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
(``delisted''), based on a new analysis of the rat's dispersal ability.
The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the
requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50
CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dipodomys
stephensi). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that delisting the Stephens' kangaroo rat may be
warranted, we are not initiating a status review in response to this
petition. Our justification for this finding can be found as an
appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-
0140 under the ``Supporting Documents'' section. However, we ask that
the public submit to us any new information that becomes available
concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at
any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Tinian Monarch as an Endangered or
Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R1-ES-2015-0118 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Tinian monarch (Monarcha takatsukasae); Tinian Island (an island in the
Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands)
Petition History
On December 12, 2013, we received a petition dated December 11,
2013, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the
Tinian monarch be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In a January 29, 2014, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition
and did not find that the petition presented information that an
emergency listing is warranted. This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Tinian monarch (Monarcha takatsukasae) based on
Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Tricolored Blackbird as an
Endangered Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R8-ES-2015-0138 under the Supporting Documents section.
[[Page 56431]]
Species and Range
Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor); California, Oregon, Nevada,
Washington (United States), and Baja California (Mexico)
Petition History
On February 5, 2015, we received a petition dated February 3, 2015,
from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the
tricolored blackbird be listed as endangered under the Act. The
petitioner also requested that critical habitat be designated for this
species. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included
the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required
at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a March 13, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition
and did not find that the petition presented information that an
emergency listing is warranted. This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) based on
Factors A, C, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for the
tricolored blackbird, the Service requests information on the five
listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the U.S. Distinct Population Segment
(DPS) of Tufted Puffin as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the
Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R1-ES-2015-0108 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Contiguous U.S. DPS of tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata); Washington,
Oregon, California
Petition History
On February 14, 2014, we received a petition dated February 12,
2014, from Natural Resources Defense Council, requesting that the
contiguous U.S. DPS of the tufted puffin be listed as endangered or
threatened and that critical habitat be designated for this species
under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and
included the requisite identification information for the petitioner,
required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the contiguous U.S. DPS of tufted puffin (Fratercula
cirrhata) based on Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status
review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the
species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on
the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including
the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Virgin River Spinedace as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2015-0121 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Virgin River spinedace (Lepidomeda mollispinis mollispinis); Arizona,
Nevada, and Utah
Petition History
On November 20, 2012, we received a petition dated November 20,
2012, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the
Virgin River spinedace be listed as endangered or threatened under the
Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the
requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50
CFR 424.14(a). In a December 20, 2012, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition
and did not find that the petition presented information that an
emergency listing is warranted. This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Virgin River spinedace (Lepidomeda mollispinis
mollispinis) based on Factors A, C, and E. However, during our status
review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the
species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on
the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including
the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Wood Turtle as an Endangered or
Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R5-ES-2015-0122 under the Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta); Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia,
West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Canada
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the wood turtle, be listed as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for
these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the wood turtle
(Glyptemys insculpta) as endangered or threatened may be warranted
based on Factors A, B, C, D, and E. Thus, for this species, the Service
requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1)
of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see
Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Yuman Desert Fringe-toed Lizard as
an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act
Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at http://
[[Page 56432]]
www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2015-0124 under the
Supporting Documents section.
Species and Range
Yuman desert fringe-toed lizard (Uma rufopunctata); Arizona (United
States) and Sonora (Mexico)
Petition History
On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of
reptiles and amphibians, including the Yuman desert fringe-toed lizard,
be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be
designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Yuman desert fringe-
toed lizard (Uma rufopunctata) may be warranted based on Factors A and
E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service
requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1)
of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see
Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).
Conclusion
On the basis of our evaluation of the information presented under
section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have determined that the petitions
summarized above for the Cahaba pebblesnail and Stephens' kangaroo rat
do not present substantial scientific or commercial information
indicating that the requested actions may be warranted. Therefore, we
are not initiating status reviews for these species.
The petitions summarized above for the blue Calamintha bee,
California spotted owl, Cascade torrent salamander, Columbia torrent
salamander, Florida pine snake, Inyo Mountains salamander, Kern Plateau
salamander, lesser slender salamander, limestone salamander, northern
bog lemming, Panamint alligator lizard, Peaks of Otter salamander,
regal fritillary, rusty patched bumble bee, Shasta salamander, short-
tailed snake, southern rubber boa, Tinian monarch, tricolored
blackbird, tufted puffin, Virgin River spinedace, wood turtle, and the
Yuman desert fringe-toed lizard present substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the requested actions may be
warranted.
Because we have found that these petitions present substantial
information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted, we
are initiating status reviews to determine whether these actions under
the Act are warranted. At the conclusion of the status reviews, we will
issue a 12-month finding, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of the
Act, as to whether or not the Service believes listing is warranted.
It is important to note that the ``substantial information''
standard for a 90-day finding differs from the Act's ``best scientific
and commercial data'' standard that applies to a status review to
determine whether a petitioned action is warranted. A 90-day finding
does not constitute a status review under the Act. In a 12-month
finding, we will determine whether a petitioned action is warranted
after we have completed a thorough status review of the species, which
is conducted following a substantial 90-day finding. Because the Act's
standards for 90-day and 12-month findings are different, as described
above, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that the 12-month
finding will result in a warranted finding.
References Cited
A complete list of references cited is available on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the appropriate lead
field offices (contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this notice are staff members of the
Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Authority
The authority for these actions is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: August 31, 2015.
Stephen Guertin,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-23315 Filed 9-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P