FWS Focus

Overview

Characteristics
Overview

The whooping crane (Grus americana) occurs only in North America, specifically within Canada and the United States, and is North America’s tallest bird. It is a flagship species for the wildlife conservation movement in North America, as it symbolizes the struggle for survival that characterizes endangered species worldwide, as was noted in the international recovery plan in 2007.

Historically, more than 10,000 whooping cranes once populated North America. Its north to south range included Canada and the United State to Mexico, and its east to west range included the Rocky Mountains to the East Coast, as documented in the 5-year review in 2011. Population declines were caused primarily by shooting and destruction of habitat in the prairies from agricultural development, as was noted in the international recovery plan in 2007. The international recovery plan also notes that all whooping cranes alive today have come from the all-time low of 15 whooping cranes that were wintering at Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Austwell, Texas in 1941. This is currently the best place to find this species during the winter, as noted by Cornell University in 2019. Cornell University also notes that in the summer, this species can be found at Wood Buffalo National Park in Canada and that Nebraska’s Platte River often hosts this species during migration.

Strict legal protection, habitat preservation, captive breeding, international cooperation between Canada and the United States have helped to promote recovery of this species. These successes are also because of collaboration among state and federal governments, non-governmental and non-profit organizations like zoos and other conservation groups, as well as private citizens. Whooping cranes continue to face threats from alteration and destruction of habitat - including migratory habitat and winter habitat - from wetland drainage, increased development and conversion of suitable habitat to agriculture. The increase in the frequency and severity of drought due to climate change climate change
Climate change includes both global warming driven by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns. Though there have been previous periods of climatic change, since the mid-20th century humans have had an unprecedented impact on Earth's climate system and caused change on a global scale.

Learn more about climate change
, as well as the reduction in river flows degrade migration roost habitat. In 1998, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department documented that reduced freshwater inflows that are due to diversions, as well as withdrawals for agriculture and human use also have a negative impact on the species. They also noted that declines in blue crab populations from reduced inflow were a part of the many threats facing whooping cranes.

Scientific Name

Grus americana
Common Name
Whooping Crane
FWS Category
Birds
Kingdom

Location in Taxonomic Tree

Genus

Identification Numbers

TSN:

Characteristics

Characteristic category

Habitat

Characteristics
Habitat

The whooping crane breeds, migrates, winters and forages in a variety of habitats, including coastal marshes and estuaries, inland marshes, lakes, open ponds, shallow bays, salt marsh salt marsh
Salt marshes are found in tidal areas near the coast, where freshwater mixes with saltwater.

Learn more about salt marsh
and sand or tidal flats, upland swales, wet meadows and rivers, pastures and agricultural fields, as was noted in the 5-year review.

The 5-year review also notes that the loss of wetlands to cropland conversion, urbanization, roads and powerlines, as well as wind farms, has a significant negative impact to the migratory corridor used by whooping cranes. Furthermore, decreases in river flows have degraded riverine migration habitat for this species and development is also encroaching on salt marsh habitat that is used by whooping cranes in the winter.

Coastal

The land near a shore.

Lake

A considerable inland body of standing water.

River or Stream

A natural body of running water.

Wetland

Areas such as marshes or swamps that are covered often intermittently with shallow water or have soil saturated with moisture.

Characteristic category

Food

Characteristics
Food

Summer foods include large nymphal or larval forms of insects, frogs, rodents, small birds, minnows and berries, as R. P. Allen documented in 1956, and was later confirmed by N. Novakowski in 1966 and D.G. Bergeson and others in 2001. Allen and many others researchers documented that the whooping crane winter diet consists mainly of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus), clams (Tagelus constricta) and Carolina wolfberry (Lycium carolinianum). Carolina wolfberry (Lycium carolinianum) is an important food for whooping cranes in the fall.

Characteristic category

Behavior

Characteristics
Behavior

Whooping cranes live and travel alone, in pairs, as families or in flocks of 50 or more birds during migration as A.J. Caven and others documented in 2020. Cornell University also note that sometimes whooping cranes will flock with sandhill cranes, spending their time on the ground and in shallow water. Some restoration activities have focused on clearing and maintaining roost sites free of trees and shrubs, restoring and rehabilitating wetland meadows and marshes adjacent to river channels, as noted in the international recovery plan of 2007. Cornell University also notes that whooping cranes cannot land on trees and thus, do not use them, and that the strong homing instinct of whooping cranes limits their dispersal to new habitat.

Characteristic category

Physical Characteristics

Characteristics
Weight

Weight of the whooping crane ranges between 13.2 and 17.2 pounds (6.0 to 7.8 kilograms). Captive males average 16 pounds (7.3 kilograms) and females average 14 pounds (6.4 kilograms).

Color & Pattern

Adult plumage is primarily snowy white. Exceptions to the white plumage include the:

  • Primary feathers, the largest flight feathers on its wing, are black
  • Alula, specialized feathers attached to the upper leading end of the wing, are black or grayish
  • Crown, which is a vivid crimson color and has sparse black bristly feathers
  • Malar region, the side of the head from the bill to the angle of the jaw, has sparse black bristly feathers
  • Nape, which has a dark gray-black wedge-shaped patch

When the wings are folded back, the black primaries and black or grayish alula are not visible. The bill is dark olive-gray outside of the breeding season, and lighter olive-gray during the breeding season. The area at the base of the bill is pink or rosaceous in color.

Upon hatching, the iris of the eye is blue, as observed by researcher Jane Chandler, with the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center and noted in the international recovery plan of 2007. Chandler also noted that it gradually turns gray in chicks and becomes yellow by the end of the first year. The legs and feet are gray-black in color.

Juveniles display a reddish cinnamon plumage. White feathers begin to appear on the neck and back at 120 days of age, and this white plumage replaces the reddish cinnamon plumage throughout the winter months. By the following spring, the plumage is predominantly white, and the dark red crown, lores, meaning the area between eye and bill, and malar areas have manifested. Rusty juvenile plumage remains only on the head, the upper neck, secondary wing coverts, which are smaller feathers that cover the middle of wing, and scapulars, which are the wing feathers that arise from the shoulder, as documented by J.D. Stephenson in 1971. Yearlings achieve typically adult plumage late in their second summer.

Sound

The common name whooping crane probably originated from the loud, single-note vocalization given repeatedly by the birds when they are alarmed. 

Size & Shape

Whooping cranes are tall, white birds with long necks and long legs. They have stout, straight bills. Their body is slender and widens to a plump bustle by the tail. When in flight, the wings of a whooping crane are broad and the neck is fully extended. Their wingspan is more than 7 feet. This species is monomorphic; both sexes stand about 5 feet (1.5 meters) in height when standing erect.

Characteristic category

Life Cycle

Characteristics
Life Cycle

Every two to three years, whooping cranes complete a full flightless molt of primary flight feathers, which makes them more vulnerable to predation threats and perhaps prompts them to change their habitat selection from open wetlands to areas with a higher concentration of cover, as noted by A. Lacy and D. McElwee in 2016.

Life Span

Whooping cranes are a long-lived species, with current estimates suggesting a maximum longevity of at least 30 years for individuals in the wild, as documented by C. Mirande and others in 1993. A.F. Moody documented in 1931, and F. McNulty later confirmed in 1966, that captive individuals can live 35 to 40 years.

Reproduction

Whooping Cranes are monogamous, meaning that they mate for life, as was documented by D.R. Blankinship in 1976 and confirmed by others in the 1980s. However, Blankinship and others also observed that if a mate dies, this species will form another pair bond, sometimes within only a few days following the death of a mate.

Whooping cranes form their pair bonds at 2 or 3 years of age. Pair formation can occur rapidly, or it can be a lengthy process that develops over one to three winters, as documented by M.A. Bishop in 1984. Bishop and others also observed that new pairs often establish a winter territory near the winter territory of their parents. The courting rituals of whooping cranes include elaborate and energetic dancing displays during which the birds bob their heads, flap their wings, leap into the air and fling feathers and grass.

Whooping cranes may start nesting as early as 3 years of age, as documented by E. Kuyt and J. P. Goossen in 1987, but the average age of first egg production is 5 years. Eggs are normally laid in late April to mid-May. Whooping cranes may re-nest if their first clutch is destroyed or lost before mid-incubation, as documented by R.C. Erickson and others in the early 1980s, but E. Kuyt noted that re-nesting has only been documented a few times. A large majority of clutches contain two eggs, but clutches of one egg and three eggs have also been documented by Kuyt in 1995. Eggs in clutches of two are laid 48 to 60 hours apart and incubation begins with the first egg laid, which results in asynchronous hatching of the eggs. This asynchrony may follow the insurance hypothesis, meaning that the parents produce a back-up offspring in case the first one does not make it, as documented by S. Forbes and D. Mock in 2000. Asynchronous hatching may be an adaptation to the availability of food resources or habitat suitability. Those eggs that are laid after incubation has begun usually only produce fledged young if the earlier laid egg fails to hatch or the chick dies soon after hatching. Therefore, although whooping cranes may lay two eggs, only about 10% of families arriving on the winter range have two chicks, noted R.C. Erickson in 1975. However, in years with suitable habitat conditions, crane pairs have been known to raise two young, noted B.W. Johns in 1998.

Eggs are light brown or olive-buff, with the blunt end of the egg bearing a concentration of dark, purplish-brown blotches. Egg length averages approximately 4 inches (100 millimeters), while width averages 2.5 inches (63 millimeters), as described by A.C. Bent in 1926, as well as R.P. Allen in 1952 and others in following decades. Whooping cranes tend to nest annually, but have been known to skip a year if they are nutritionally stressed or if nesting habitat conditions are unsuitable, as documented by F. Chavez-Ramirez and others in 1997 and later confirmed by B.W. Johns in 1998. The international recovery plan of 2007 clarified that there may also be other reasons that are not yet clear for this nesting behavior.

Each breeding pair has a territory defended primarily by the male, whose defense tactics may include running, flapping, hissing, stabbing or jumping and slashing with his feet, as described by Cornell University in 2019. Cornell University also noted that both parents incubate and brood-rear the young. One member of the pair remains on the nest at all times, with the exception of brief intervals. Females tend to incubate at night, as documented by R.P. Allen in 1952 and L.H. Walkinshaw later confirmed in 1965 and1973. Females also assume primary responsibility of feeding and caring for the young, as was documented by D.R. Blankinship in 1976. Parents and young return to the nest each night during the first three to four days after hatching; thereafter, parents brood their young wherever they are at night or during inclement weather. During the first 20 days after hatching, the parents and their young tend to stay within 1.1 miles (1.8 kilometers) of the nest site as observed by Ernie Kuyt and referenced in the international recovery plan of 2007. Doug Bergeson observed that their daily movements average 0.2 miles (340 meters), as further referenced in the international recovery plan.

Characteristic category

Similar Species

Characteristics
Similar Species

Species that may appear similar in appearance to whooping cranes include:

  • American white ibis
  • American white pelicans
  • Great egrets
  • Sandhill cranes
  • Snow geese
  • Wood storks

Geography

Characteristics
Range

The historical range of the whooping crane from north to south range included Canada and the United State to Mexico, and its east to west range included the Rocky Mountains to the East Coast, as noted in the 5-year review. Specific states where occurrence of this species was documented include Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. 

Four geographically distinct populations exist in the wild, as noted in the 5-year review:

  1. Aransas Wood Buffalo Population – The only natural, self-sustaining population in existence migrates between Aransas National Wildlife Refuge on the Texas Coast and Wood Buffalo National Park in Alberta, Canada
  2. Central Florida – An experimental, non-migratory population that was reintroduced from 1993 to 2005
  3. Eastern Migratory Population – An experimental population that was reintroduced from 2001 to 2010 and migrates between Wisconsin and Florida
  4. White Lake, Louisiana - A non-migratory flock that was introduced in 2011

The natural population nests in Wood Buffalo National Park and adjacent areas in Canada and winters in coastal marshes in Texas at Aransas. The 5-year review of 2011 notes that none of the reintroduced populations are self-sustaining. The 5-year review of 2011 also notes that there was a population that was reintroduced into the Rocky Mountains from 1975 to 1989, and the last remaining wild bird from that population died in the spring of 2002.

Launch Interactive Map

Timeline

Explore the information available for this taxon's timeline. You can select an event on the timeline to view more information, or cycle through the content available in the carousel below.

25 Items

Listing

Listing

Listing

Critical Habitat

Critical Habitat

Critical Habitat

Critical Habitat

Notice

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Critical Habitat

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Recovery Plan

Recovery Plan

Five Year Review

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Five Year Review

Five Year Review

1680
1690
1700
1710
1720
1730
1740
1750
1760
1770
1780
1790
1800
1810
1820
1830
1840
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2080
2090
2100
2110
2120
2130
2140
2150
2160
2170
2180
2190
2200
2210
2220
2230
2240
2250
2260
2270
2280
2290
2300
1938
1939
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2051

Listing

Mar 11, 1967

Mar 11, 1967 Listing (Endangered)
Endangered Species List - 1967
  • Publication type: Final
Item 1

Listing

Apr 14, 1970

Apr 14, 1970 Listing (Endangered)
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Endangered Species Conservation); 35 FR 6069
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 2

Listing

Jun 2, 1970

Jun 2, 1970 Listing (Endangered)
Part 17 - Conservation of Endangered Species and Other Fish or Wildlife (First List of Endangered Fo…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 3

Critical Habitat

Dec 16, 1975

Dec 16, 1975 Critical Habitat
Proposed Determination of Critical Habitat for Snail Darter, American Crocodile, Whooping Crane, Cal…
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 4

Critical Habitat

May 15, 1978

May 15, 1978 Critical Habitat
Determination of Critical Habitat for the Whooping Crane
  • Publication type: Final
Item 5

Critical Habitat

Aug 17, 1978

Aug 17, 1978 Critical Habitat
Proposed Critical Habitat for the Whooping Crane
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 6

Critical Habitat

Mar 6, 1979

Mar 6, 1979 Critical Habitat
Requirement to Withdraw or Supplement Proposals to Determine Various U.S. Taxa of Plants and Wildlif…
  • Publication type: Withdrawal
Item 7

Notice

Mar 6, 1979

Mar 6, 1979 Notice
Requirement to Withdraw or Supplement Proposals to Determine Various U.S. Taxa of Plants and Wildlif…
  • Publication type: Information Solicitation
Item 8

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Sep 29, 1992

Sep 29, 1992 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Proposal to Establish an Experimental Nonessential Population of Whooping Cranes in Florida; 5…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 9

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Sep 29, 1992

Sep 29, 1992 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Proposal to Establish an Experimental Nonessential Population of Whooping Cranes in Florida; 5…
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 10

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Jan 22, 1993

Jan 22, 1993 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Establishment of an Experimental Nonessential Population of Whooping Cranes in Florida; (Grus…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 11

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Jan 22, 1993

Jan 22, 1993 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Establishment of an Experimental Nonessential Population of Whooping Cranes in Florida; (Grus…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 12

Critical Habitat

Feb 6, 1996

Feb 6, 1996 Critical Habitat
ETWP; Proposal to Designate the Whooping Cranes of the Rocky Mountains as Experimental Nonessential…
  • Publication type: Withdrawal
Item 13

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Feb 6, 1996

Feb 6, 1996 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Proposal to Designate the Whooping Cranes of the Rocky Mountains as Experimental Nonessential…
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 14

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Jul 21, 1997

Jul 21, 1997 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Final Rule to Designate the Whooping Crane of the Rocky Mountains as Experimental Nonessential…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 15

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Jul 21, 1997

Jul 21, 1997 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
ETWP; Final Rule to Designate the Whooping Crane of the Rocky Mountains as Experimental Nonessential…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 16

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Mar 9, 2001

Mar 9, 2001 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposal to Establish a Nonessential Experimental Pop…
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 17

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Jun 26, 2001

Jun 26, 2001 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Populati…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 18

Recovery Plan

Jan 11, 2005

Jan 11, 2005 Recovery Plan (Document Availability (non-FR))
Notice of Availability of the Draft Revised Recovery Plan for the Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
  • Publication type: Draft
Item 19

Recovery Plan

May 29, 2007

May 29, 2007 Recovery Plan (Document Availability (non-FR))
Notice of Availability of the Revised Recovery Plan for the Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
  • Publication type: Final
Item 20

Five Year Review

Mar 29, 2010

Mar 29, 2010 Five Year Review (Information Solicitation)
5-Year Status Reviews of 14 Southwestern Species
  • Publication type: Notice
Item 21

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Aug 19, 2010

Aug 19, 2010 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Endangered Whooping Cranes in Southwester…
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 22

Experimental Pop Designation (10j)

Feb 3, 2011

Feb 3, 2011 Experimental Pop Designation (10j) (Non-essential)
Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Endangered Whooping Cranes in Southwester…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 23

Five Year Review

May 5, 2021

May 5, 2021 Five Year Review (Information Solicitation)
Initiation of 5- Year Status Reviews of 23 Species in the Southwest; request for information
  • Publication type: Notice
Item 24

Five Year Review

Jan 25, 2024

Jan 25, 2024 Five Year Review (Information Solicitation)
Initiation of 5-Year Status Reviews of 22 Species in the Southwest
  • Publication type: Notice
Item 25