WASHINGTON – The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced today that it will distribute $1.1 billion in revenues generated by the hunting and angling industry to state and territorial fish and wildlife agencies throughout the nation. The funds support critical fish and wildlife conservation and recreation projects that benefit all Americans.
The Service apportions the funds to all 50 states and U.S. territories through the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration and Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration programs. Revenues come from excise taxes generated by the sale of sporting firearms, ammunition, archery equipment, fishing equipment, electric boat motors, and from taxes on the purchase of motorboat fuel.
“These funds are the cornerstone of state-based efforts that are critical to the preservation of America’s wildlife and natural resources,” said Service Director Dan Ashe. “But they are also the fuel for a massive financial engine that benefits outdoor recreationists, hunters, boaters and anglers, equipment manufacturers and retailers, and local and regional economies. Their value cannot be overstated in providing opportunities for the next generation of Americans to get outdoors, experience our wild places and learn the importance of conserving our natural heritage.”
Pittman Robertson-Dingell Johnson funds are distributed by the Service’s Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration program. Since their inception, the programs have generated more than $15 billion to conserve fish and wildlife resources and support outdoor recreation opportunities for the American public. The recipient State fish and wildlife agencies have matched these funds with more than $5 billion over the years, mostly through hunting and fishing license revenues.
“The Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration program provides critical funding for conservation projects and outdoor recreation activities across this great nation,” said Assistant Director Hannibal Bolton of the Service’s WSFR program. “I can’t stress enough that the key to the program’s success is through our dedicated partnerships with State agencies, non-government organizations and many others.”
“It is thanks to this significant financial investment made by America’s sportsmen and women and the hunting, shooting sports, angling and boating industries that state and territorial fish and wildlife agencies can deliver science-based conservation on the ground,” said Larry Voyles, Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies President and Arizona Game and Fish Department Director. “The Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program has made the difference between the survival and abundance of some species and it helps agencies, like mine, manage a vast estate of lands and waters and connect more people to wildlife-related recreation.”
Below is a state-by-state listing of the Service’s final apportionment of Wildlife Restoration Funds and Sport Fish Restoration funds for Fiscal Year 2015. To learn more about the Service’s WSFR program visit: http://wsfrprograms.fws.gov/.
STATE | |||||||||
ALABAMA | $25,562,321 | ||||||||
ALASKA | $51,951,630 | ||||||||
AMERICAN SAMOA | $2,502,516 | ||||||||
ARIZONA | $27,219,443 | ||||||||
ARKANSAS | $19,403,525 | ||||||||
CALIFORNIA | $44,134,573 | ||||||||
COLORADO | $28,516,034 | ||||||||
CONNECTICUT | $9,242,606 | ||||||||
DELAWARE | $8,232,316 | ||||||||
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | $1,155,056 | ||||||||
FLORIDA | $25,607,039 | ||||||||
GEORGIA | $25,236,594 | ||||||||
GUAM | $2,502,516 | ||||||||
HAWAII | $8,232,316 | ||||||||
IDAHO | $21,670,126 | ||||||||
ILLINOIS | $23,783,360 | ||||||||
INDIANA | $18,386,530 | ||||||||
IOWA | $16,502,569 | ||||||||
KANSAS | $19,984,814 | ||||||||
KENTUCKY | $19,623,501 | ||||||||
LOUISIANA | $22,570,941 | ||||||||
MAINE | $11,872,265 | ||||||||
MARYLAND | $11,140,015 | ||||||||
MASSACHUSETTS | $11,131,347 | ||||||||
MICHIGAN | $37,569,842 | ||||||||
MINNESOTA | $37,850,616 | ||||||||
MISSISSIPPI | $15,109,447 | ||||||||
MISSOURI | $29,783,609 | ||||||||
MONTANA | $29,781,997 | ||||||||
N. MARIANA ISLANDS | $2,502,516 | ||||||||
NEBRASKA | $17,608,725 | ||||||||
NEVADA | $19,340,531 | ||||||||
NEW HAMPSHIRE | $8,232,316 | ||||||||
NEW JERSEY | $11,131,347 | ||||||||
NEW MEXICO | $22,125,164 | ||||||||
NEW YORK | $28,927,341 | ||||||||
NORTH CAROLINA | $31,320,942 | ||||||||
NORTH DAKOTA | $16,004,762 | ||||||||
OHIO | $24,084,830 | ||||||||
OKLAHOMA | $25,729,133 | ||||||||
OREGON | $26,047,277 | ||||||||
PENNSYLVANIA | $37,974,470 | ||||||||
PUERTO RICO | $7,024,381 | ||||||||
RHODE ISLAND | $8,232,316 | ||||||||
SOUTH CAROLINA | $15,674,905 | ||||||||
SOUTH DAKOTA | $19,016,379 | ||||||||
TENNESSEE | $31,366,355 | ||||||||
TEXAS | $54,850,661 | ||||||||
UTAH | $20,944,045 |