FWS Focus

Overview

Characteristics
Overview

California clapper rails occur almost exclusively in tidal and brackish marshes with unrestricted daily tidal flows, adequate invertebrate prey food supply, well-developed tidal channel networks, and suitable nesting and escape cover to provide habitat during extreme high tides. Their current distribution is restricted to the San Francisco Bay Estuary (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013, 2020).  

Clapper rails are secretive and difficult to observe (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1984). Rails prefer to walk or run over other forms of locomotion, and they swim well (Sibley 1955. Ripley 1977, Todd 1986). When flushed, they normally fly only a short distance before landing (Zucca 1954). Clapper rails are at least seasonally monogamous, and defend overlapping year-round territories (Zembal et al. 1989, Albertson 1995, Garcia 1995). Both sexes share in incubation, which lasts from 18 to 29 days (Taylor 1996).

Lack of extensive blocks of tidal marsh with suitable structure structure
Something temporarily or permanently constructed, built, or placed; and constructed of natural or manufactured parts including, but not limited to, a building, shed, cabin, porch, bridge, walkway, stair steps, sign, landing, platform, dock, rack, fence, telecommunication device, antennae, fish cleaning table, satellite dish/mount, or well head.

Learn more about structure
is the ultimate limiting factor for the species’ recovery (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). Non-native mammalian predators are a significant threat to the species, (Albertson and Evens 2000) and vulnerability to predation is exacerbated by reduction of clapper rail habitat to narrow and fragmented patches close to urban edge areas that diminish habitat quality. Levees provide artificial access for terrestrial predators and displace optimal cover of high marsh vegetation. Although Bay-wide invasion of exotic Spartina alterniflora (smooth cordgrass) and its hybrids with the native S. foliosa may threaten California clapper rails in future decades, hybrid Spartina currently provides habitat for the rail, and eradication of exotic hybrid Spartina is a current threat (Casazza et al. 2016, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2020). Contaminants, particularly methylmercury, are a significant factor affecting viability of California clapper rail eggs (Ackerman et al. 2012, Casazza et al. 2014). Low genetic diversity is an increasing concern for the species, with Wood et al. (2017) documenting low contemporary gene flow among the regional marshes and significantly high genetic relatedness among individuals within marshes. Anticipated sea level rise presents a severe threat in the long term, especially in the central and south San Francisco Bay, where opportunities for landward migration of habitat are absent (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2103, Zhang and Gorelick 2014, Rosencranz et al. 2018, Thorne et al. 2018, Thorne et al. 2019).

Taxonomy Note: Based on the work of Maley and Brumfield (2013), the American Ornithologist’s Union (AOU) Committee on Classification and Nomenclature accepted in its 55th Supplement to the AOU Check-list of North American Birds (Chesser et al. 2014), revisions to the specific assignments under the genus Rallus. Among those changes, the species R. obsoletus (Ridgway’s rail) and R. crepitans (Clapper rail) were split from R. longirostris, and R. longirostris was deleted.

The AOU Check-list of North American Birds has not addressed subspecies treatments since its 5th edition was published in 1957. Rather, the AOU refers to the listing of the Birds of North America by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology for subspecies treatments. In its subspecies treatments for R. obsoletus (Eddelman and Conway 2018), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology included a change from California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) to California Ridgway’s Rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus).

Until a time when the USFWS formally adopts the taxonomic and nomenclature changes described above, the USFWS maintains the use of California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) as used in this species profile.

Scientific Name

Rallus longirostris obsoletus
Common Name
California Clapper Rail
California Ridgway''s rail
FWS Category
Birds
Kingdom

Location in Taxonomic Tree

Identification Numbers

TSN:

Characteristics

Characteristic category

Habitat

Characteristics
Habitat

Throughout their distribution, California clapper rails occur within a range of tidal and brackish marshes (Harvey et al. 1977). In the south and central San Francisco Bay, and along the perimeter of San Pablo Bay, rails typically inhabit tidal marshes dominated by Sarcocornia pacifica and Spartina foliosa, especially where significant habitats exist that are accessible during high tide. Spartina dominates the lower marsh zone (marsh plain) throughout the south and central Bay (DeGroot 1927, Hinde 1954, Harvey 1988). Sarcocornia dominates the middle and sometimes upper marsh zone throughout the south and central Bay, with Distichlis spicata, Jaumea carnosa, Frankenia salina (alkali-heath), and others mixing with occasional Sarcocornia in the high marsh zone. Grindelia stricta var. angustifolia occurs along the upper edge of tidal sloughs throughout the entire San Francisco Bay Estuary. The marshes of Humboldt Bay, Morro Bay and Elkhorn Slough historically have not supported Spartina. Vegetation at these locations has been dominated by Sarcocornia pacifica and Distichlis spicata (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013).

Rail foraging and refugial habitat encompasses the lower, middle and high marsh zones, as well as the adjacent transitional zone. Lower and middle marsh zones provide foraging habitat at low tide. Small tidal channels (i.e., first- and second-order) with dense vegetation covering the banks are particularly important habitat features (Keldsen 1997, Garcia 1995). These provide important foraging habitat and hidden routes for travel in close proximity to nesting habitat. Within tidal marshes in portions of north San Francisco Bay, the abundance of California clapper rails is positively correlated with channel density or the total length of channel per unit area of marshland (Garcia 1995, Evens and Collins 1992, Collins et al. 1994, Foin et al. 1997). Keldsen (1997) found that rails prefer locations with a greater number of tidal creeks, Grindelia shrubs and higher elevations. However, high tide conditions result in increased predator pressure on rails in a high marsh zone that has already been reduced by decades of developmental pressure. Sea level rise is expected to increasingly threaten California clapper rail tidal marsh habitat extent and condition (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013, Zhang and Gorelick 2014, Rosencranz et al. 2018, Thorne et al. 2018, Thorne et al. 2019).

Wetland

Areas such as marshes or swamps that are covered often intermittently with shallow water or have soil saturated with moisture.

Characteristic category

Physical Characteristics

Characteristics
Sound

Clapper rails have a wide variety of calls, although few are commonly heard. All calls are variants on a single note, with differences due to changes in intensity, pitch, note length and interval between notes. Massey and Zembal (1987) grouped clapper rail vocalizations into eight calls, of which four are commonly heard: clapper, kek, kekburr and agitated kek. The clapper is the basic species call, serving as a territory pronouncement and for mutual mate recognition. Both sexes clapper year-round, with daily peaks at dawn and dusk (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013).

Size & Shape

The California clapper rail is one of the largest species of the genus Rallus, measuring 32-47 centimeters (13-19 inches) from bill to tail (Ripley 1977).

Weight

Males generally weigh 300-350 grams (0.66-0.77 pound) and females 248-301 grams (0.55-0.66 pound; Taylor 1996).

Color & Pattern

The clapper rail has a hen-like appearance, with a long, slightly downward curved orange bill, a reddish brown breast, black and white barred flanks, and white undertail feathers. Juveniles have a paler bill and darker plumage, with a gray body, black flanks and sides, and indistinct light streaking on flanks and undertail feathers. Downy young are black with dark legs (Eddleman and Conway 1998).

Characteristic category

Food

Characteristics
Food

The clapper rail is an omnivore with a relatively broad feeding niche. Animal matter has been consistently emphasized as a major component of the diet (Moffitt 1941, Heard 1982, Zembal and Fancher 1988). Food items found in California clapper rails' stomachs include introduced ribbed horse mussel (Ischadium demissum), spiders (Lycosidae spp.), clams (Macoma balthica), yellow shore crabs (Hemigrapsus oregonensis), amphipods (shrimp-like crustaceans), Nereis vexillosa (a polychaete worm) and striped shore crab (Pachygrapsus crassipes; Williams 1929, Applegarth 1938, Test and Test 1942, Varoujean 1972). Rails occasionally have been seen capturing and consuming rodents, particularly during higher tides; small birds are also occasionally taken (Spendelow and Spendelow 1980, Jorgenson and Ferguson 1982).

Characteristic category

Behavior

Characteristics
Behavior

Clapper rails are secretive and difficult to observe (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1984). Rails prefer to walk or run over other forms of locomotion, and they swim well (Sibley 1955. Ripley 1977, Todd 1986). When flushed, they normally fly only a short distance before landing (Zucca 1954).

Clapper rails are active for 75 to 90 percent of the day. Activity peaks in the early morning and late evening (Zembal and Massey 1983, Zembal et al. 1989), when rails forage in the marsh vegetation. Rails often roost at high tide during the day (Zembal et al. 1989).

They exhibit strong territorial defense, particularly during the late winter and early breeding seasons (Williams 1929, Albertson 1995, Garcia 1995). Territoriality weakens during extreme high tides when cover is limited, and during the post breeding season (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). Clapper rails generally exhibit strong site fidelity (Albertson 1995).

A banding study in the mid-1980s revealed movement of rails in the south Bay of about 500 m (1,641 ft) from the original capture site (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). Longer distance dispersal has also been documented, with a female rail moving 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) over three days (Albertson 1995) and a male rail moving 44.8 kilometers (27.8 miles) over 43 days (Casazza et al. 2008).

A 1991-1992 radiotelemetry study in south San Francisco Bay indicated an average home range of 4.7 hectares (11.6 acres) and an average core use area of 0.9 hectare (2.2 acres) (Albertson 1995).

Characteristic category

Life Cycle

Characteristics
Life Cycle

The breeding period of the California clapper rail is prolonged. Pair bonding and nest building are generally initiated by mid-February. Nesting may begin as early as late February or early March (Evens and Page 1983) and extend through July in the south Bay, and into August in the north Bay (DeGroot 1927, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service unpubl. Data in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). There appears to be a break in nesting between mid-May through late June in the north Bay, a period that corresponds to the highest summer tides (Evens and Page 1983). Two peaks in nesting activity occur, a greater peak between mid-April and early May and a lesser peak between late June and early July (DeGroot 1927, Applegarth 1938, Gill 1972, Harvey 1988). The second nesting peak has been interpreted as attempts by late nesters (DeGroot 1927), second attempts after initial nesting failures (Gill 1972), or second broods (Wilbur and Tomlinson 1976).

Life Span

The only estimates of annual adult California clapper rail survivorship are relatively low, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 (Albertson 1995). These are similar to survival estimates reported for the Yuma subspecies (Eddleman 1989). Increased predation occurs during extreme winter high tides, probably due to increased movement of rails at this time when little cover is available (Albertson and Evens 2000). Adult survivorship has been suggested as the key demographic variable associated with survival of clapper rail populations (Foin et al. 1997).

Reproduction

Clapper rails are at least seasonally monogamous, and defend overlapping year-round territories (Zembal et al. 1989, Albertson 1995, Garcia 1995). Males perform most of the nest building (Meanley 1985). Rails frequently build several nest platforms, but use only one for incubation (Applegarth 1938, Gill 1972, Wilbur and Tomlinson 1976). Nests must be built at an elevation that protects the bowl from complete inundation during high tides (Evens and Collins 1992, Collins et al. 1994).

Egg-laying often begins prior to completion of the nest (Eddleman and Conway 1998). Both sexes share in incubation, which lasts from 18 to 29 days (Taylor 1996). Eggs are approximately 45 millimeters (1.77 inch) in length, and light tan or buff-colored with cinnamon-brown or dark lavender spotting concentrated at the broader end. Clutch size ranges from 5 to 14 eggs (DeGroot 1927, Gill 1972). Hatching is generally synchronous, but eggs may hatch one to several days apart (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). After hatching, adults remain with the chicks for up to five to six weeks (Applegarth 1938, Meanley 1985).

Several studies from across the species’ range from 1988 through 1999 (Harvey 1988, Foerster et al. 1990, Schwarzbach et al. 2006) demonstrate nest success (the rate of nests having at least one egg hatch) of 32% to 56%, hatching success (the rate of eggs hatched per total eggs laid) of 19% to 41%, and a predation rate of 30% to 39%. Normal hatching success of other clapper rail eggs can be much higher (Kozicky and Schmidt 1949).

Geography

Characteristics
Range

California clapper rails were historically abundant in all tidal and brackish marshes in the San Francisco Bay vicinity (Cohen 1895), as well as in all of the larger tidal estuaries from Marin to San Luis Obispo counties in California. They are now restricted almost entirely to the marshes of the San Francisco Bay Estuary, where the only known breeding populations occur (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013, 2020).

Launch Interactive Map

Timeline

Explore the information available for this taxon's timeline. You can select an event on the timeline to view more information, or cycle through the content available in the carousel below.

7 Items

Listing

Listing

Recovery Plan

Five Year Review

Recovery Plan

Five Year Review

Technical Correction

1700
1710
1720
1730
1740
1750
1760
1770
1780
1790
1800
1810
1820
1830
1840
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2080
2090
2100
2110
2120
2130
2140
2150
2160
2170
2180
2190
2200
2210
2220
2230
2240
2250
2260
2270
2280
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049

Listing

Aug 25, 1970

Aug 25, 1970 Listing (Endangered)
Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Conservation of Endangered Species and Other Fish or Wildlife)
  • Publication type: Proposed
Item 1

Listing

Oct 13, 1970

Oct 13, 1970 Listing (Endangered)
Appendix D - United States List of Endangered Native Fish and Wildlife; 35 FR 16047 16048
  • Publication type: Final
Item 2

Recovery Plan

Feb 10, 2010

Feb 10, 2010 Recovery Plan (Document Availability (non-FR))
Draft Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California
  • Publication type: Draft
Item 3

Five Year Review

May 21, 2010

May 21, 2010 Five Year Review (Information Solicitation)
Initiation of 5-Year Reviews of 34 Species in California and Nevada; Availability of 96 Completed 5-…
  • Publication type: Notice
Item 4

Recovery Plan

Feb 26, 2014

Feb 26, 2014 Recovery Plan (Document Availability (non-FR))
Notice of Availability: Final Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central Calif…
  • Publication type: Final
Item 5

Five Year Review

Jun 18, 2018

Jun 18, 2018 Five Year Review (Information Solicitation)
Initiation of 5-Year Status Reviews of 50 Species in California, Nevada, and the Klamath Basin of Or…
  • Publication type: Notice
Item 6

Technical Correction

Jul 31, 2023

Jul 31, 2023 Technical Correction
General Provisions; Revised List of Migratory Birds (& taxonomic corrections for 9 ESA-listed sp…
  • Publication type: Direct Final
Item 7