Melospiza melodia samuelis

Song Sparrow

FWS Focus

Overview

Song Sparrows are medium-sized and fairly bulky with a rounded head. Their bill is short and stout, tail long and rounded, and wings broad. Song Sparrows are streaky and brown, with thick streaks on a white chest and flanks. On a closer look, the head is a mix of warm red-brown and slaty-gray. However, these shades as well as the amount of streaking, vary extensively across North America.

References cited in Species Profile

  • Aldrich, J. W. 1984. Ecogeographical variation in size and proportions of Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Ornithol. Monog. 35:1-134.
  • Arcese, Peter, Mark K. Sogge, Amy B. Marr and Michael A. Patten. 2002. Song Sparrow (Melospizamelodia), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/704
  • Cogswell, H. 2000. Song Sparrow, in Baylands ecosystem species and community profiles: Life histories and environmental requirements of key plants, fish and wildlife (Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project, P. R. Olofson, ed.), pp. 374-385. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, CA.
  • Collins, J. N., and Resh, V. H. 1985. Utilization of natural and man-made habitat by the salt marsh Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia samuelis (Baird). Calif. Fish Game 71:40-52.
  • Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2015. Song Sparrow. All About Birds. http://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Song_Sparrow/id
  • Davis, A. and P. Arcese. 1999. An examination of migration in Song Sparrow using banding recovery data. N. Am. Bird-bander 24:124-128.
  • Grenier, J. L. 2004. Ecology, behavior, and trophic adaptations of the Salt Marsh Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia samuelis: The importance of the tidal influence gradient. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Calif., Berkeley.
  • Gutenspergen, G. R., and Nordby, J. C. 2006. The impact of invasive plants on tidal-marsh vertebrate species: Common Reed (Phragmites australis) and Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) as case studies. Studies Avian Biol. 32:229-239.
  • Johnston, R. F. 1956. Population structure in salt marsh Song Sparrows. Part I. Environment and annual cycle. Condor 58:24-44.
  • Marshall, J. T., Jr. 1948. Ecologic races of Song Sparrows in the San Francisco Bay region. Part I. Habitat and abundance. Condor 50:193-215.
  • Nice, M. M. 1937. Studies in the life history of the Song Sparrow, Pt. I. Trans. Linn. Soc. N.Y. 4:1-247.
  • Partners in Flight. 2012. Species assessment database. http://rmbo.org/pifassessment/Database.aspx
  • Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E., and Fallon, J. 2005. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966-2004, version 2005.2. USGS Patuxent Wildl. Res. Ctr., Laurel, MD. Available at www.mbr-pwrc. usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html
  • Scollon, D. B. 1993. Spatial analysis of the tidal marsh habitat of the Suisun Song Sparrow. M.A. thesis, San Francisco State Univ., San Francisco.
  • Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California.
  • USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. 2012. North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966 - 2010 analysis. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/specl10.html

Scientific Name

Melospiza melodia samuelis
Common Name
Song Sparrow
FWS Category
Birds
Kingdom

Location in Taxonomic Tree

Identification Numbers

TSN:

Geography

Launch Interactive Map

Timeline

Explore the information available for this taxon's timeline. You can select an event on the timeline to view more information, or cycle through the content available in the carousel below.

3 Items

Listing

Listing

Listing

1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
March
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.

Listing

Jan 6, 1989

Jan 6, 1989 Listing
ETWP; Animal Notice of Review; 54 FR 554 579
  • Publication type: CNOR
Item 1

Listing

Nov 21, 1991

Nov 21, 1991 Listing
ETWP; Animal Candidate Review for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species; 56 FR 58804 58836
  • Publication type: CNOR
Item 2

Listing

Nov 15, 1994

Nov 15, 1994 Listing
ETWP; Animal Candidate Review for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species.
  • Publication type: CNOR
Item 3